A new study published in Nature by University of Cambridge researchers just dropped a pixelated bomb on the entire Ultra-HD market, but as anyone with myopia can tell you, if you take your glasses off, even SD still looks pretty good :)

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Kind of a tangent, but properly encoded 1080p video with a decent bitrate actually looks pretty damn good.

    A big problem is that we’ve gotten so used to streaming services delivering visual slop, like YouTube’s 1080p option which is basically just upscaled 720p and can even look as bad as 480p.

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      This. The visual difference of good vs bad 1080p is bigger than between good 1080p and good 4k. I will die on this hill. And Youtube’s 1080p is garbage on purpose so they get you to buy premium to unlock good 1080p. Assholes

      • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The 1080p for premium users is garbage too. Youtube’s video quality in general is shockingly poor. If there is even a slight amount of noisy movement on screen (foliage, confetti, rain, snow, etc) the the video can literally become unwatchable.

    • notfromhere@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I can still find 480p videos from when YouTube first started that rival the quality of the compressed crap “1080p” we get from YouTube today. It’s outrageous.

      • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Sadly most of those older YouTube videos have been run through multiple re-comoressions and look so much worse than they did at upload. It’s a major bummer.

    • Feyd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yeah I’d way rather have higher bitrate 1080 than 4k. Seeing striping in big dark or light spots on the screen is infuriating

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      A big problem is that we’ve gotten so used to streaming services delivering visual slop, like YouTube’s 1080p option which is basically just upscaled 720p and can even look as bad as 480p.

      YouTube is locking the good bitrates behind the premium paywall and even as a premium users you don’t get to select a high bitrate when the source video was low res.

      That’s why videos should be upscaled before upload to force YouTube into offering high bitrate options at all. A good upscaler produces better results than simply stretching low-res videos.

    • deranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      HEVC is damn efficient. I don’t even bother with HD because a 4K HDR encode around 5-10GB looks really good and streams well for my remote users.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I stream YouTube at 360p. Really don’t need much for that kind of video.