cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/54239937

During the Great Depression, when banks foreclosed on farms, neighbors often showed up at the auctions together.

They’d bid only a few cents, and return the land to the family that lost it. Sometimes a noose hung nearby as a warning to outsiders not to profit from someone else’s ruin.

It was rough, but it worked, communities protected each other when the system wouldn’t.

If a collapse like that happened today, do you think people would still stand together or has that kind of solidarity disappeared? Could it happen again?

  • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Is that seriously a question? “Is it right to create an in-group or should we just help everyone who gives a shit about the social contract?”

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yes. It’s the underlying problem. Even your summary is a valid question. People standing together means everybody has to be part of the in-group, or if there are various groups, they still have to find a common social contract. Otherwise somebody will use the situation for their benefit.