They make laws that claim to be for everybody but are only for people who aren’t rich or powerful. The rich and powerful can commit bribery, human trafficking, murder, and more without consequence but yet jail people for doing the same thing. It’s like parents who swear all the time but punish their children for swearing.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    Not all government. Government is actually really good and useful. In the hands of psychopaths and grifters it becomes an edifice to tear down because it offers protections and rules.

    Anyone who says “government is the problem” fundamentally does not understand the role of government in society.

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 days ago

      The reason I said governments in general was I didn’t want to single out any particular country when lots of countries are like this. I agree that government isn’t inherently bad if done right.

    • Pudutr0n@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Anyone who thinks a consistently good government that works in the benefit of the vast majority of a large population is possible fundamentally does not understand the role of psychopathy in leadership.

      Have you considered all the invisible slavery and oppression a “good government” turns a blind eye against? They seem to emerge in places that stole the reat of the world blind some way or another until recently.

      Some problems have no solution.

  • henfredemars@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Don’t forget debt. I have to have an emergency fund but you just print money and spend it like there’s no tomorrow for years on end?

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      That’s because macroeconomics actually do work differently than microeconomics. The idea that a country should be run like a household is fallacy.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      Buddy, I hate to tell you this…but thats not in human nature.

      What I have seen time and time again, is people are herded like sheep. A select few will take advantage of this, and herd the masses to their control.

      Been like this for thousands of years.

  • Corridor8031@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    i mean the people are also kind of like voting for this actively… (depending on location ofc)

    • Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      First-past-the-post: I will elect out of touch politicians with only 39% of the vote.

      Then the people will eat up all the poor excuses from the rich from implementing real democratic proportional representation.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        More like we don’t have a choice, and the math wasn’t done to prove that we wouldn’t have a choice for another 65-75 years after we set up the first modern democracy based on 6 Nations philosophy, but go ahead, go off.