I think Lemmy has a problem with history in general, since most people on here have degrees/training in STEM. I see a lot of inaccurate “pop history” shared on here, and a lack of understanding of historiography/how historians analyze primary sources.

The rejection of Jesus’s historicity seems to be accepting C S Lewis’s argument - that if he existed, he was a “lunatic, liar, or lord,” instead of realizing that there was nothing unusual about a messianic Jewish troublemaker in Judea during the early Roman Empire.

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Because of the destruction of the Temple and the Judean rebellion there were probably a lot of messianic figures.

    Jesus is just the one who achieved the necessary memetic virulence to be remembered.

    Saul/Paul definitely helped this.

    ETA: Also, stories attributed to Jesus may have happened to other messianic preachers.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      The entire myth was also borrowed from Zoroastrianism, but let’s just pretend that never happened I guess

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I mean, I guess… But they stole like, the entire fucking thing from an existing religion. Christianity would not exist without the parts they took from Zoroastrianism.

            • andros_rex@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Uh… how?

              The Zoroastrian “borrowing” is more along the lines of there’s a perfect good force versus a perfect evil force.

              But I don’t know how there would be any Hinduism influence. There’s lot of Greek influence, but India was really far away.

              • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                The Zoroastrian “borrowing” is more along the lines of there’s a perfect good force versus a perfect evil force.

                This is far from the only thing. They also had the concept that everyone has free will to choose between good and evil. I believe they also had a concept of final judgement and heaven/hell (or an analogue).

                • andros_rex@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  What similarities to Krishna? Please give me some examples, and a plausible explanation of how those ideas would have crossed the continent?

                  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 hours ago

                    Jesus coming to earth as a human was possibly borrowed from Krishna, who I believe came to earth as an “avatar”.

                    I think there are other similarities between Jesus and Krishna.

          • Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            They did not steal anything. It’s such a weird take to be out here applying 20th century notions of Intellectual Property to mythology from 2000 years ago. If you approach old world cultures and memetic ecology with reddit catchphrases, you’re just gonna rot your brain. Not worth it.